![]() college of education | fall 2000 | Back to Contents | The Education Policy Center at MSU : 1. 2. 3 | |
|
| The Education Policy Center| Article 1 Bridging the Gap New Education Policy Center's Goal Is to Be Information Resource for Policymakers and Michigan Educators For years, the College of Education has made outreach to lawmakers and educational leaders a priority. But earlier this year, the college took an important step forward in its outreach efforts when it established the Education Policy Center at Michigan State University, a nonpartisan institution that has as its goal to provide those who make decisions about the states educational system with accurate and timely research-based information. It marks the colleges most ambitious and formalized effort to date in its long history of playing an important role in improving the quality of education for students, and deepening the educational policy debate in Michigan. With the strong support of Dean Carole Ames, the center will move quickly to become an important voice in Michigans educational policy debate. I think this is a good idea at the right time, said Professor David Plank, who is the centers new director. In the policy arena, education is really at the top of almost everyones agenda whether its at the state, federal or local levels. President (Peter) McPherson and Provost (Lou Anna) Simon have made a strong commitment of university resources to ensure that the university has a positive and significant role to play in bringing about improvements in the educational system. For Plank and other faculty members in the college, the need for a policy center had become apparent over the years. At a time when the states economic base is being reshaped by technological change and global competition, and Michigans economic future is increasingly dependent on a strong educational system and a well-educated workforce, the university has not had a systematic way for researchers and policymakers to exchange ideas and information. The center will fill that gap. One of the good reasons for having a policy center like this is that in the absence of such a center, there is no institutionalized way for the university to learn what the issues are, what issues policymakers are paying attention to, Plank said. Nor is there really any institutionalized way for policy people to learn what kinds of research the university might be able to bring to bear on policy problems. So, a critical function for the center is to provide that bridge so that theres a way for the university and college to keep an ear to the ground on educational policy issues, and also to facilitate access to the research that faculty at Michigan State are doing. * * * The center is by no means the colleges only initiative
geared at reaching out to lawmakers and educational leaders. The center builds on a strong
outreach infrastructure developed by the colleges Office of K-12 Outreach under the
direction of Barbara Markle. In fact, the college has engaged in an intense effort in recent
years to make its research accessible to various constituencies. Two years ago, the college in conjunction with the
Presidents Office established the Presidents Education Forum in which faculty
present their policy-related research to legislators at monthly sessions. In addition, the Office of K-12
Outreach has in recent years initiated conferences on educational standards and, in
collaboration with Plank , on school choice issues. Markle has also worked closely with
policymakers, putting on briefings on educational policy for new legislators. The college
has also established the Education Research Report series that digests research of
particular interest to lawmakers and educational leaders. The response to Markles projects and the colleges
dissemination of research was so positive that it became impetus for creating a formal center for education policy that could
would closely with the Office of K-12 Outreach to help legislators, educators and Michigan
residents become better informed about current and emerging issues. Dean Ames appointed a task force last year to develop a proposal
for the creation of the center. Task force members included Markle, Associate Dean Micheal
Sedlak, Educational Administration Chairperson Philip Cusick, and faculty members Robert
Floden, William Schmidt, BetsAnn Smith, Gary Sykes, Teresa Tatto, and Suzanne Wilson.
David Plank (right) introduces Political Science Professor Richard Hula (left) at the Education Policy Center's first forum earlier this year. Part of the center's many outreach efforts is a speaker series on education policy issues. |
|
David Plank Plank said that the issue of partisanship and the battle of
contending lobbies over education issues is essential to understanding the role of the new
center. Michigan has other policy centers, he said, but none that are nonpartisan. The
center will stake its claim, Plank added, on its fairness, accuracy and nonpartisanship. Theres an important distinction to make and thats the distinction between being involved in the debate and adopting an advocacy position on the debate, Plank said. I dont foresee the center taking a stand in favor of particular policy positions. What I do think the center can do is bring reliable, research-based information to policy debates. I believe that sometimes that information will be more supportive of one position than another, but the goal of the center is not to advocate particular positions but simply to inform the policy debate. Personally, I think the greatest danger to the center is in
becoming identified with a predictable position because, in a policy realm like education
that is highly contentious, you automatically lose half your audience when you do that. I
think the only way we can avoid that is to insure that we stick closely to the research,
that we base what we say and what we publish on research results and not on the opinions
or preferences of any particular group. Plank looks to two similar centers as models. The first is Policy
Alternatives for California Education (PACE), which was begun as a joint effort of the
University of California at Berkeley, Stanford and University of Southern California some
20 years ago. The other center is at Indiana University, which also has established itself
as a reliable source of information on educational policy issues in that state. Plank said both centers have managed to stay away from adopting
ideological positions, have engaged in solid research, and have been committed to
disseminating their findings. This is the path Plank plans to have the MSU center follow. |
|
![]() |
|
(School
and educators gathered at MSU in the spring to discuss school choice. The Education Policy
Center will hold an annual conference on policy issues on in the years ahead.) * * * For Dean Ames, the new center is a natural outgrowth of extensive
policy-related research faculty have been conducting for years. It is research that ranges
from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), and its implications
for mathematics and science education in Michigan and the rest of the country, to school
choice, teacher preparation, the Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement
(CIERA). Indeed, Plank and colleagues Gary Sykes and David Arsen issued a highly regarded
report last year on charter schools and interdistrict choice that was lauded for its
fairness and insight. It is the kind of research that the center hopes to build on. The college is home to a wealth of research that can inform policy
decisions, Ames said, and it is critical to ensure that there is an effective system in
place to reach out to policymakers and educators. The center, Ames added, is only the latest example of the college
and universitys commitment to effective and meaningful outreach. We as a college have had a very strong commitment to
outreach for a long time, Ames said. The policy center is something unique at
a time when issues of K-12 education are at the forefront of the state and national
agenda. I think the center, under the direction of David Plank, can
play a pivotal role in the years ahead. For Plank, the center is an exciting new opportunity for faculty
both within the college and from throughout the university to engage policymakers and
educational leaders on an ongoing basis. In its first year, the center is concentrating on educational
accountability and is tailoring much of its research and outreach efforts around that
issue. In the years ahead, other pressing educational issues will take center stage, Plank
said. The center will also track issues and policy developments in other states and Washington, D.C., Plank said, but its main focus will always remain on Michigans educational system. I am very excited about the center, Plank said.
For me personally, this represents the culmination of a lot of things that I have
worked on throughout my career, and its an opportunity to really bring to bear
research on problems of education and make a difference in Michigan. Thats very rewarding and I think the center has a bright future. |
|
| Back to Contents | The Education Policy Center at MSU : 1. 2. 3 | |
|